Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

Botswana and Namibia's bans on South African produce challenge SACU principles

Agricultural economists Thabile Nkunjana and Sifiso Ntombela have highlighted the tension arising from Botswana and Namibia's bans on South African citrus and vegetables. They argue that these bans contravene the principles of the Southern African Customs Union (Sacu), undermining the regional value chain. South African farmers and agribusinesses, having invested significantly in ensuring a steady food supply within Sacu, find their efforts compromised. The economists stress the importance of maintaining open trade practices across Sacu nations to avoid eroding competitiveness and forcing consumers to pay higher prices for produce. They advocate for lifting the current bans to foster intra-African trade.

The discourse extends to the broader implications of protectionist policies within Sacu. While South Africa has engaged in similar practices, raising duties under the guise of localisation, the economic detriment of such policies is evident. Despite political gains, these strategies are economically damaging, failing to generate the purported job creation or industrialisation. Botswana's economic diversification efforts, crucial due to its reliance on diamond mining, face challenges similar to those encountered by other resource-dependent economies. The fluctuating global market prices for diamonds underscore the need for economic diversification to mitigate vulnerability.

Moreover, the Sacu revenue sharing formula plays a significant role in the economies of member states, with Botswana and Namibia heavily reliant on Sacu receipts. The decision by these countries to restrict imports from South Africa, despite the potential for increased revenue through the Sacu formula, reflects a complex interplay of economic and political considerations. Botswana's investment in citrus production, aimed at competitive export markets, further complicates the situation. The closure of its market to South African imports risks access to a larger regional market, highlighting the counterproductive nature of such trade barriers.

In conclusion, the trade restrictions imposed by Botswana and Namibia on South African citrus and vegetables present a multifaceted issue within the Sacu framework. The economic rationale behind these bans, juxtaposed with the need for economic diversification and competitiveness, underscores the challenges facing regional trade and economic policy in Southern Africa.

Source: IOL

Publication date: