Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber
British Berry Growers voices concerns over sustainability of these changes

New auditing requirements impact on UK berry industry

The UK berry industry, represented by British Berry Growers, is facing potential financial pressures due to proposed changes in the Supplier Ethical Data Exchange (Sedex) audit regime, specifically the introduction of SMETA 7.0. This new auditing requirement emphasizes an 'employer pays principle,' necessitating growers to cover recruitment and transportation fees for seasonal workers.

British Berry Growers, an entity that represents 95% of UK-grown berries such as strawberries, raspberries, blueberries, blackberries, and cherries, has voiced concerns over the sustainability of these changes. The sector, which relies heavily on seasonal labor for harvesting, could see an increase in costs by approximately £60 million annually, as stated by Nick Marston, the chair of British Berry Growers.

Marston criticized the lack of consultation and clarity regarding the financial responsibility for these new requirements, expressing apprehension over the potential financial burden on growers. The industry is awaiting the outcome of a British Retail Consortium (BRC) and Defra impact assessment on the 'employer pays principle,' expected in 2025. British Berry Growers advocates for the removal of the requirement for employers to pay travel and visa expenses in the SEDEX 7.0 audit and seeks assurance from the BRC that non-compliance will not result in punitive measures. Marston highlighted the risk of cost absorption by members, suggesting that support from retailers or the government might be necessary to mitigate the impact on UK food price inflation and security.

Source: farminguk.com

Publication date: