Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

Massachusetts cuts HIP benefits, sparking concerns for families and farmers

In Massachusetts, the Department of Transitional Assistance's Healthy Incentives Program (HIP), which supplements food assistance recipients with funds for fresh, locally sourced produce, is set for a reduction in its monthly allocation. From December 1, the program will provide a uniform $20 per month to beneficiaries, a decrease from the current scale of $40 to $80 based on household size. This change is anticipated to affect the purchasing power of families at qualified vendors, where they receive instant reimbursements on their EBT cards for produce purchases.

The impending cut has raised concerns among farmers and lawmakers, highlighting the dual benefit of the program in enhancing access to nutritious food for SNAP recipients and stimulating the local agricultural economy. The reduction is feared to have adverse health outcomes for families and potential economic losses for vendors. Advocates, including those from the urban farming nonprofit Mill City Grows in Lowell, have voiced worries about the diminished affordability of local farm produce for low-income families, which could lead to decreased market attendance.

Mill City Grows and other agricultural entities have adapted their offerings to cater to the culturally diverse preferences of their clientele, partly through the incentives provided by HIP. The program's success in fostering a sustainable ecosystem of local food production and consumption has been underscored by participants, who now face the challenge of adjusting to reduced benefits.

State officials attribute the need for the program's restructuring to budgetary constraints, aiming to maintain its operation within available funds. Meanwhile, hunger advocates and some state legislators are calling for additional funding to sustain the program's benefits at current levels, emphasizing its importance for both Massachusetts families and the agricultural sector.

Source: GBH

Publication date: